• Tax havens or safe havens?

    What Have We Learned from the Panama Papers So Far?

    The Panama Papers is a treasure trove of information on the activities and clientele of a large, but not a typical law firm operating in an offshore financial centre. In this case, it is a firm called Mossack Fonseca, based in Panama. It follows a series of spectacular leaks by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, including the HSBC files and the Luxembourg leaks. Here are six things that stand out from the latest revelations.

    1. Same old techniques

    view 0

  • Tax havens are usually places with nice weather or something nice to do.

    Sun, Surf, Skiing, and No Taxes

    The Panama Papers leak sheds some light on the intricate ways in which the wealthy can exploit secretive offshore tax regimes. As well as charging minimal or no tax to residents and non-residents, the main characteristics of tax havens are their lack of transparency and effective information exchange.

    As the leaked files of Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca show, these havens are used by individuals and companies to stash their cash away from the prying eyes of civilians or investigators. This is not necessarily because their money has been obtained illegally.

    view 0

  • Africa is missing out on millions in taxes from the wealthy.

    Taxing Africa's Wealthy is not an Easy Propostion

    A great deal of attention has been paid to the obstacles African governments face in effectively taxing the profits of transnational corporations. African governments are frequently urged to widen their tax bases by reducing tax incentives for foreign investors. But what about Africa’s rich? Some Africans are very rich, and in many cases, they are not paying their fair share of taxes.

    view 0

  • Australia's tax reform, via economic modelling, is not getting done.

    Economic Modelling Your Tax Burden

    The current debate on tax reform in Australia is strong on rhetoric but largely devoid of hard evidence. Also missing are clear proposals from the government that can be assessed on their respective merits.

    The purported benefits of reform centre on worthy outcomes such as a larger economy, reduced government deficits, more stable revenue sources, less complexity and a fairer system.

    view 0

  • At least in the U.K., taxing a company's sales is a bad political idea.

    Apparently, Taxing a Company's Sales is a Bad Idea

    In the midst of the row about Google’s low tax settlement, former chancellor Lord Lawson came up with a radical proposal. In an era where multinationals can artificially shift profits around the world, he said that taxing those profits has “had its day”, and corporation tax should instead be greatly reduced and “bolstered” by a tax on companies' sales – the total amount of money that a business receives from selling goods or services to its customers.

    view 0

  • The U.K.'s HMRC has two tax goals, both involve collecting taxes.

    The U.K. is Looking for a Taxpayer's Champion

    January is a busy month for tax in the UK as millions of people struggle to complete their tax returns before the January 31 deadline.

    Meanwhile, HMRC, the tax agency, is dealing with public ire over its acceptance of Google’s complex – but perfectly legal – tax arrangements and it is trying to find a new chief executive to replace the incumbent, Lin Homer, who recently resigned and will step down in April. It is a tough time for the UK’s tax authority.

    view 0

  • Google, and others, can pay more tax if the laws change.

    The (Tax Inversion) Law of the Land

    Globalisation – and the global economic crisis – have contributed to the erosion of national tax bases and in recent years some of the biggest multinationals, among them Apple, Vodafone, Amazon, Google, Starbucks and Microsoft, have been scrutinised for their aggressive tax planning practices. Using (among other techniques) transfer pricing, inter-company lending, royalty payments for licensing agreements, cost-sharing agreements and offsetting group losses, multinational groups can achieve very low effective tax rates.

    view 0

  • Ted Cruz's tax plan is as bold as he is, but is it realistic?

    The Ted Cruz Tax Plan: Realistic Feat or Campaign Hot Air?

    Presidential primary season is ebb and flow, and no one knows for sure who the Republican nominee will be, but it is becoming all too apparent of who stands the best chance: Ted Cruz, Donald Trump or Marco Rubio. Rubio represents the establishment wing of the Republican Party, while Cruz and Trump compete for the grassroots conservative crowd that is tired of politics as usual.

    view 0

  • Where did all of that taxable income go?

    A Corporate Tax (Avoidance) Lesson from Down Under

    With much anticipation and very little fanfare the Australian Taxation Office quietly released information about corporate tax entities with a total income of $100 million or more for the 2013–14 income year and how much tax they paid.

    view 0

  • The benefits of a banking GST should outweigh the challenge to create it.

    The Benefits of a Banking GST for Australia

    South Australian Premier Jay Weatherill has argued for broadening the GST base to include all financial services, something also floated by the Financial System Inquiry. The idea has merit, although the complexity of the issue makes assessing the consequences and merits difficult.

    view 0